Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Recently, direct numerical simulations (DNS) of stably stratified turbulence have shown that as the Prandtl number ($$Pr$$) is increased from 1 to 7, the mean turbulent potential energy dissipation rate (TPE-DR) drops dramatically, while the mean turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate (TKE-DR) increases significantly. Through an analysis of the equations governing the fluctuating velocity and density gradients we provide a mechanistic explanation for this surprising behaviour and test the predictions using DNS. We show that the mean density gradient gives rise to a mechanism that opposes the production of fluctuating density gradients, and this is connected to the emergence of ramp cliffs. The same term appears in the velocity gradient equation but with the opposite sign, and is the contribution from buoyancy. This term is ultimately the reason why the TPE-DR reduces while the TKE-DR increases with increasing$$Pr$$. Our analysis also predicts that the effects of buoyancy on the smallest scales of the flow become stronger as$$Pr$$is increased, and this is confirmed by our DNS data. A consequence of this is that the standard buoyancy Reynolds number does not correctly estimate the impact of buoyancy at the smallest scales when$$Pr$$deviates from 1, and we derive a suitable alternative parameter. Finally, an analysis of the filtered gradient equations reveals that the mean density gradient term changes sign at sufficiently large scales, such that buoyancy acts as a source for velocity gradients at small scales, but as a sink at large scales.more » « less
-
Abstract The behavior of suspended particles in turbulent flows is a recalcitrant problem spanning wide‐ranging fields including geomorphology, hydrology, and dispersion of particulate matter in the atmosphere. One key mechanism underlying particle suspension is the difference between particle settling velocity (ws) in turbulence and its still water counterpart (wso). This difference is explored here for a range of particle‐to‐fluid densities (1–10) and particle diameter to Kolmogorov micro‐eddy sizes (0.1–10). Conventional models of particle fluxes that equatewstowsoresult in eddy diffusivities and turbulent Schmidt numbers contradictory to laboratory experiments. Incorporating virtual mass and Basset history forces resolves these inconsistencies, providing clarity as to whyws/wsois sub‐unity for the aforementioned conditions. The proposed formulation can be imminently used to model particle settling in turbulence, especially when sediment distribution outcomes over extended time scales far surpassing turbulence time scales are sought.more » « less
-
The equation for the fluid velocity gradient along a Lagrangian trajectory immediately follows from the Navier–Stokes equation. However, such an equation involves two terms that cannot be determined from the velocity gradient along the chosen Lagrangian path: the pressure Hessian and the viscous Laplacian. A recent model handles these unclosed terms using a multi-level version of the recent deformation of Gaussian fields (RDGF) closure (Johnson & Meneveau,Phys. Rev. Fluids, vol. 2 (7), 2017, 072601). This model is in remarkable agreement with direct numerical simulations (DNS) data and works for arbitrary Taylor Reynolds numbers$$\textit {Re}_\lambda$$. Inspired by this, we develop a Lagrangian model for passive scalar gradients in isotropic turbulence. The equation for passive scalar gradients also involves an unclosed term in the Lagrangian frame, namely the scalar gradient diffusion term, which we model using the RDGF approach. However, comparisons of the statistics obtained from this model with DNS data reveal substantial errors due to erroneously large fluctuations generated by the model. We address this defect by incorporating into the closure approximation information regarding the scalar gradient production along the local trajectory history of the particle. This modified model makes predictions for the scalar gradients, their production rates, and alignments with the strain-rate eigenvectors that are in very good agreement with DNS data. However, while the model yields valid predictions up to$$\textit {Re}_\lambda \approx 500$$, beyond this, the model breaks down.more » « less
-
Budgets of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and turbulent potential energy (TPE) at different scales $$\ell$$ in sheared, stably stratified turbulence are analysed using a filtering approach. Competing effects in the flow are considered, along with the physical mechanisms governing the energy fluxes between scales, and the budgets are used to analyse data from direct numerical simulation at buoyancy Reynolds number $$Re_b=O(100)$$ . The mean TKE exceeds the TPE by an order of magnitude at the large scales, with the difference reducing as $$\ell$$ is decreased. At larger scales, buoyancy is never observed to be positive, with buoyancy always converting TKE to TPE. As $$\ell$$ is decreased, the probability of locally convecting regions increases, though it remains small at scales down to the Ozmidov scale. The TKE and TPE fluxes between scales are both downscale on average, and their instantaneous values are correlated positively, but not strongly so, and this occurs due to the different physical mechanisms that govern these fluxes. Moreover, the contributions to these fluxes arising from the sub-grid fields are shown to be significant, in addition to the filtered scale contributions associated with the processes of strain self-amplification, vortex stretching and density gradient amplification. Probability density functions (PDFs) of the $Q,R$ invariants of the filtered velocity gradient are considered and show that as $$\ell$$ increases, the sheared-drop shape of the PDF becomes less pronounced and the PDF becomes more symmetric about $R=0$ .more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Turbulent flows are out-of-equilibrium because the energy supply at large scales and its dissipation by viscosity at small scales create a net transfer of energy among all scales. This energy cascade is modelled by approximating the spectral energy balance with a nonlinear Fokker–Planck equation consistent with accepted phenomenological theories of turbulence. The steady-state contributions of the drift and diffusion in the corresponding Langevin equation, combined with the killing term associated with the dissipation, induce a stochastic energy transfer across wavenumbers. The fluctuation theorem is shown to describe the scale-wise statistics of forward and backward energy transfer and their connection to irreversibility and entropy production. The ensuing turbulence entropy is used to formulate an extended turbulence thermodynamics.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
